Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Theoretical Politics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunleavy, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Concept of Equality in Policy Analysis

Patrick Dunleavy

Starting from Walzer's account of `complex equality', an integrated treatment is given of three fundamental decision principles - equality of supply, proportional equality and equality of deficits - which between them exhaust all applications of `equality' considerations in policy analysis. They provide sophisticated and distinctive solutions for distributing scarce public policy benefits where individuals, households, groups or areas are recognized to have varied capacities to absorb supply. They can be applied successfully in societies with both private and public forms of supply, and where supply is lumpy or there are insufficient supply units. The equality of supply and proportional equality principles also function effectively in resource-raising contexts, where public supply is wholly negative. The choice of equality principle appropriate for a given issue area depends on: the nature of people's capacities; the information requirements of the rule; whether problems of oversupply would arise; what factors might affect the feasibility and desirability of imposing negative public supply; and what the rule's distributive implications are for different kinds of people. More substantive egalitarian arguments advocate using public supply in an investment mode not just to bring immediate distributions into conformity with one of the basic equality principles, but also to equalize capacity variations themselves over the longer term.

Key Words: equality • policy analysis • public policy • egalitarianism

Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 213-248 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0951692889001002005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?