Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Theoretical Politics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Feld, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Geometry of Majority Rule

Nicholas R. Miller

Bernard Grofman

Scott L. Feld

We present some basic results concerning the spatial theory of voting in such a way that the theorems and their proofs should be accessible to a broad audience of political scientists. We do this by making the presentation essentially geometrical. We present the following results in particular: Plott's `pairwise symmetry' condition for an unbeaten point; McKelvey's `global cycling' theorem; Ferejohn, McKelvey and Packel's cardioid construction for establishing bounds on a `win set'; and McKelvey's circular bound on the `uncovered set' of points.

Key Words: majority rule • spatial voting models

Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 1, No. 4, 379-406 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0951692889001004001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Theoretical PoliticsHome page
T. Brauninger
Stability in Spatial Voting Games with Restricted Preference Maximizing
Journal of Theoretical Politics, April 1, 2007; 19(2): 173 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
POLIT ANALHome page
N. R. Miller
In Search of the Uncovered Set
Political Analysis, January 1, 2007; 15(1): 21 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Theoretical PoliticsHome page
S. Hug and G. Tsebelis
Veto Players and Referendums Around the World
Journal of Theoretical Politics, October 1, 2002; 14(4): 465 - 515.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Theoretical PoliticsHome page
J. M. Colomer
On the Geometry of Unanimity Rule
Journal of Theoretical Politics, October 1, 1999; 11(4): 543 - 553.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
S. Hug
Nonunitary Actors in Spatial Models: How Far Is Far in Foreign Policy?
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 1999; 43(4): 479 - 500.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Theoretical PoliticsHome page
B. Boockmann
Agenda Control by Interest Groups in Eu Social Policy
Journal of Theoretical Politics, April 1, 1998; 10(2): 215 - 236.
[Abstract]


Home page
Rationality and SocietyHome page
O.-J. SKOG
"Volonte Generale" and the Instability of Spatial Voting Games
Rationality and Society, April 1, 1994; 6(2): 271 - 285.
[Abstract]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
O.-J. Skog
The Voting Paradox in Socially Integrated Populations
Acta Sociologica, January 1, 1993; 36(3): 207 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]