This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Braun, D. Articles by Gilardi, F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Taking ‘Galton's Problem’ Seriously

Towards a Theory of Policy Diffusion

Institut d'Etudes Politiques et Internationales, Université de Lausanne, Bâtiment Humense, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland dietmar.braun{at}unil.ch

Fabrizio Gilardi

Institut d'Etudes Politiques et Internationales, Université de Lausanne, Bâtiment Humense, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland fabrizio.gilardi{at}unil.ch

This article builds on the recent policy diffusion literature and attempts to overcome one of its major problems, namely the lack of a coherent theoretical framework. The literature defines policy diffusion as a process where policy choices are interdependent, and identifies several diffusion mechanisms that specify the link between the policy choices of the various actors. As these mechanisms are grounded in different theories, theoretical accounts of diffusion currently have little internal coherence. In this article we put forward an expected-utility model of policy change that is able to subsume all the diffusion mechanisms. We argue that the expected utility of a policy depends on both its effectiveness and the payoffs it yields, and we show that the various diffusion mechanisms operate by altering these two parameters. Each mechanism affects one of the two parameters, and does so in distinct ways. To account for aggregate patterns of diffusion, we embed our model in a simple threshold model of diffusion. Given the high complexity of the process that results, strong analytical conclusions on aggregate patterns cannot be drawn without more extensive analysis which is beyond the scope of this article. However, preliminary considerations indicate that a wide range of diffusion processes may exist and that convergence is only one possible outcome.

Key Words: diffusion mechanisms • learning • policy change • policy diffusion • threshold models

Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 18, No. 3, 298-322 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0951629806064351


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Gilardi, K. Fuglister, and S. Luyet Learning From Others: The Diffusion of Hospital Financing Reforms in OECD Countries Comparative Political Studies, April 1, 2009; 42(4): 549 - 573. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Franzese Jr and J. C. Hays Interdependence in Comparative Politics: Substance, Theory, Empirics, Substance Comparative Political Studies, April 1, 2008; 41(4-5): 742 - 780. [Abstract] [PDF]