| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Why and how do Political Actors Pursue Risky Reforms?Department of Political Science at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, b.vis{at}fsw.vu.nl
Department of Political Science, Centre for Comparative Social Studies of the Faculty of Social Sciences, both at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, cj.van.kersbergen{at}fsw.vu.nl Why and how do political actors pursue risky welfare state reforms, in spite of the institutional mechanisms and political resistance that counteract change? This is one of the key puzzles of contemporary welfare state research, which is brought about by the absence of a complete account that identifies both the cause and causal mechanisms of risky reforms. In this article we offer a remedy for this lacuna. Prospect theory teaches us that political actors will only undertake risky reforms if they consider themselves to be in a losses domain, that is when their current situation is unacceptable. Next, we discuss the strategies that political actors use to avoid the blame associated with risky reforms. These provide the causal mechanisms linking cause and effect. The sudden outburst of risky reforms in formerly immovable Italy provides an empirical illustration of our account.
Key Words: blame avoidance causation prospect theory welfare state reform
Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 19, No. 2,
153-172 (2007) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
