Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Theoretical Politics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castles, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Dowrick, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Impact of Government Spending Levels on Medium-Term Economic Growth in the Oecd, 1960-85

Francis G. Castles

Steve Dowrick

Recent findings concerning the impact of government spending on economic growth have been as diverse as the theories underpinning them. Proceeding from a methodological critique of prior work in the field and drawing on a variety of methodological innovations suggested in recent studies, we seek to design rigorous tests using cross-section data from 18 OECD countries over four business cycles between 1960 and 1985. Government expenditure is decomposed into various categories and economic growth is corrected for cyclical disturbances. We also control for the effects of technological catch-up, institutional sclerosis and population growth along with the mediating influences of investment and employment. A variety of diagnostic statistical tests are applied, including tests for parameter stability across countries and across periods and tests for heteroscedasticity, functional form, outliers and endogeneity. We reject the hypothesis that government expenditures reduce economic growth and indicate some areas of social expenditures which may possibly tend to increase growth. We are also able to indicate the methodological assumptions and restrictions which have led to previous contrary findings.

Key Words: economic growth • government spending • diagnostic tests

Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 173-204 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0951692890002002003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of European Social PolicyHome page
F. G. Castles and H. Obinger
Social expenditure and the politics of redistribution
Journal of European Social Policy, August 1, 2007; 17(3): 206 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
National Institute Economic ReviewHome page
R. Kneller
The Implications of the Comprehensive Spending Review for the Long-Run Growth Rate: a View From the Literature
National Institute Economic Review, January 1, 2000; 171(1): 94 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
J. Carritte and J. B. Willianison
An Analysis of the Impact of Public Pension Spending on Economic Growth in the Affluent Democracies 1960-1988
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, March 1, 1995; 36(1-2): 82 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Theoretical PoliticsHome page
F. G. Castles
Democratic Politics, War and Catch-Up: Olson's Thesis and Long-Term Economic Growth in the English-Speaking Nations of Advanced Capitalism
Journal of Theoretical Politics, January 1, 1991; 3(1): 5 - 25.
[Abstract]