This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hechter, M. Articles by Kanazawa, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Group Solidarity and Social Order in Japan

Satoshi Kanazawa

This paper seeks to explain why Japan has attained a higher level of social order than comparably developed western national societies. To do so, it distinguishes the attainment of local order in social groups from the global order in national societies. Recent models of spontaneous, self-organizing order are insufficient to account for global order. In contrast to the more popular normative explanation of order in Japan, which holds that a consensus on fundamental values derived from Confucian roots is an essential cause, this paper proposes a solidaristic theory built on rational choice premises. This new theory views global order as a by-product of dependence and visibility mechanisms within key social groups such as families, schools and firms. A wide range of comparative evidence reveals that the solidaristic theory provides a superior explanation of the high level of social order in Japan than the normative one.

Key Words: crime • dependence • monitoring • rational choice

Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 5, No. 4, 455-493 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0951692893005004002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Anttila and C. Stern The Voluntary Provision of Snowmobile Trails on Private Land in Sweden Rationality and Society, November 1, 2005; 17(4): 453 - 474. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Johnson Conceptual Problems as Obstacles to Progress in Political Science: Four Decades of Political Culture Research Journal of Theoretical Politics, January 1, 2003; 15(1): 87 - 115. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Hayashi, E. Ostrom, J. Walker, and T. Yamagishi RECIPROCITY, TRUST, AND THE SENSE OF CONTROL: A CROSS-SOCIETAL STUDY Rationality and Society, February 1, 1999; 11(1): 27 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Sandell and C. Stern GROUP SIZE AND THE LOGIC OF COLLECTIVE ACTION:: A NETWORK ANALYSIS OF A SWEDISH TEMPERANCE MOVEMENT 1896-1937 Rationality and Society, August 1, 1998; 10(3): 327 - 345. [Abstract]

				P. Sztompka Trust, Distrust and Two Paradoxes of Democracy European Journal of Social Theory, July 1, 1998; 1(1): 19 - 32. [Abstract]

				P. Sztompka Trust and Emerging Democracy: Lessons from Poland International Sociology, March 1, 1996; 11(1): 37 - 62. [Abstract]

				A. G. WALDER Collective Behavior Revisited: Ideology and Politics in the Chinese Cultural Revolution Rationality and Society, July 1, 1994; 6(3): 400 - 421. [Abstract]