|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Messenger GameStrategic Information Transmission Through Legislative Committees
Tao Li
School of Economics, University of Finance and Economics, 777 Guoding Road, Shanghai, 200433, China, litaoonline{at}gmail.com
We challenge the generally accepted ally principle in legislative politics that a preference outlier committee will distort information to the legislative floor. If interest groups (or other third parties) are rational, they will withhold the most precise information for fear of committee misrepresentation. As a result, even preference outlier committees could be disciplined by their own ignorance not to distort the lobbyist message, as they are uncertain whether lying pays for the current situation or not. Our result calls into question the theoretical foundation of the influential preference outlier debate in legislative politics.
Key Words: cheap talk committee system informational lobbying messenger
References
- Austen-Smith, David (1993) `Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes', American Journal of Political Science 37(3): 799—833.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Cooper, Joseph S. (1970) The Origins of the Standing Committees and the Development of the Modern House. Houston, TX: Rice University Studies.
- Crawford, Vincent and Joel Sobel ( 1982) `Strategic Information Transmission', Econometrica 50: 1431—51.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Diermeier, Daniel and Timothy J. Feddersen (2000) `Information and Congressional Hearings', American Journal of Political Science 44: 51—65.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Fischer, Paul and Phillip Stocken (2001) `Imperfect Information and Credible Communication', Journal of Accounting Research 39(1): 119—34.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Gilligan, Thomas and Keith Krehbiel ( 1987) `Collective Decision-Making and Standing Committees: A Collective Choice Rationale for Restrictive Amendment Procedures', Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3: 287—335.[Free Full Text]
- Gilligan, Thomas and Keith Krehbiel ( 1989) `Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a Heterogeneous Committee', American Journal of Political Science 33: 459—90.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Groseclose, Tim and David C. King (2001) `Committee Theories Reconsidered', in Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer (eds) Congress Reconsidered, Chapter 9, pp. 158—9. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
- Hansen, John M. (1991) Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919—1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Krehbiel, Keith (1991) Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
- Krishna, Vijay and John Morgan (2004) `The Art of Conversation', Journal of Economic Theory 117: 147—79.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Poole, Keith and Howard Rosenthal (1997) Congress: A Political-economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Barry R. Weingast (1987) `The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power', American Political Science Review 81: 85—104.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Weingast, Barry R. and William Marshall (1988) `The Industrial Organization of Congress', Journal of Political Economy 96: 132—63.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 19, No. 4,
489-501 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/09516298070190040501

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|