This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sartori, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Comparing and Miscomparing

I seek to explain the disappointing performance of the field of comparative politics addressing the three basic questions: Why compare? What is comparable? and How? I also challenge the view that the methodology of comparison is pretty well known and established. Hosts of unsettled issues remain, while a growing cause of frustration and failure is the undetected proliferation of `cat-dogs' (or worse), that is, nonexistent aggregates which are bound to defy, on account of their non-comparable characteristics, any and all attempts at law-like generalizations. The bottom line is that the comparative endeavor suffers from loss of purpose.

Key Words: comparative method • conceptual stretching • degreeism • logic of comparison • misclassification • parochialism

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Denters and K. Mossberger Building Blocks for a Methodology for Comparative Urban Political Research Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2006; 41(4): 550 - 571. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Albrecht and O. Schlumberger "Waiting for Godot": Regime Change Without Democratization in the Middle East International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, October 1, 2004; 25(4): 371 - 392. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Capoccia Anti-System Parties: A Conceptual Reassessment Journal of Theoretical Politics, January 1, 2002; 14(1): 9 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Mossberger and G. Stoker The Evolution of Urban Regime Theory: The Challenge of Conceptualization Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 2001; 36(6): 810 - 835. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. ANCKAR and C. ANCKAR Democracies without Parties Comparative Political Studies, March 1, 2000; 33(2): 225 - 247. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. S. Brown Reading, Writing, and Regime Type: Democracy' Impact on Primary School Enrollment Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 1999; 52(4): 681 - 707. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Levitsky Institutionalization and Peronism: The Concept, the Case and the Case for Unpacking the Concept Party Politics, January 1, 1998; 4(1): 77 - 92. [Abstract]

				C. Cioffi-Revilla and D. Lai War And Politics in Ancient China, 2700 B.C. to 722 B.C.: Measurement and Comparative Analysis Journal of Conflict Resolution, September 1, 1995; 39(3): 467 - 494. [Abstract]

				P. Keraudren Administrative Reform, Ethics and Openness: The Balance between Effectiveness and Administrative Identity International Review of Administrative Sciences, March 1, 1995; 61(1): 41 - 60.

				R. H. T. O'Kane Coups d'Etat in Africa: A Political Economy Approach Journal of Peace Research, August 1, 1993; 30(3): 251 - 270. [Abstract]

				R. H. T. O'Kane The Ladder of Abstraction: The Purpose of Comparison and the Practice of Comparing African Coups d'Etat Journal of Theoretical Politics, April 1, 1993; 5(2): 169 - 193. [Abstract]

				G. Sartori Totalitarianism, Model Mania and Learning from Error Journal of Theoretical Politics, January 1, 1993; 5(1): 5 - 22. [Abstract]

				T. R. Gurr Why Minorities Rebel: A Global Analysis of Communal Mobilization and Conflict since 1945 International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, January 1, 1993; 14(2): 161 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. J. Motyl Concepts and Skocpol: Ambiguity and Vagueness in the Study of Revolution Journal of Theoretical Politics, January 1, 1992; 4(1): 93 - 112. [Abstract]