This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lijphart, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Democratization and Constitutional Choices in Czecho-Slovakia, Hungary and Poland 1989-91

Czecho-Slovakia, Hungary and Poland have made different constitutional choices with regard to their new electoral systems (ranging from extreme proportional representation to a moderately majoritarian system) and with regard to parliamentarism-presidentialism (ranging from a semi-presidential to a pure parliamentary system). Stein Rokkan's two explanations of the adoption of proportional representation in Continental Western Europe around 1900, which can be logically extended to the choice of parliamentarism or presidentialism, turn out to be the best explanations for the constitutional choices of the three East European countries around 1990 as well: (1) the logic of democratization which requires a bargain between the old-established parties and the new parties; and (2) the needs of ethnically diverse societies. These factors were reinforced, but not fundamentally determined, by the attachment to single-member district representation, the distrust of political parties, the influence of earlier and foreign democratic models, and inaccurate assessments of partisan strengths.

Key Words: democratization • ethnic pluralism • parliamentarism • presidentialism • proportional representation • Stein Rokkan

Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 207-223 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0951692892004002005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Kunicova and T. F. Remington Mandates, Parties and Dissent: Effect of Electoral Rules on Parliamentary Party Cohesion in the Russian State Duma, 1994--2003 Party Politics, September 1, 2008; 14(5): 555 - 574. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Sgouraki Kinsey and O. Shvetsova Applying the Methodology of Mechanism Design To the Choice of Electoral Systems Journal of Theoretical Politics, July 1, 2008; 20(3): 303 - 327. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Schneider and N. Wiesehomeier Rules That Matter: Political Institutions and the Diversity--Conflict Nexus Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 183 - 203. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Bakke and N. Sitter Patterns of Stability: Party Competition and Strategy in Central Europe since 1989 Party Politics, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 243 - 263. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. T. Andrews and G. R. Montinola Veto Players and the Rule of Law in Emerging Democracies Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2004; 37(1): 55 - 87. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Birch Two-Round Electoral Systems and Democracy Comparative Political Studies, April 1, 2003; 36(3): 319 - 344. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Kitschelt and R. Smyth Programmatic Party Cohesion in Emerging Postcommunist Democracies: Russia in Comparative Context Comparative Political Studies, December 1, 2002; 35(10): 1228 - 1256. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. M. Kaminski Do Parties Benefit from Electoral Manipulation? Electoral Laws and Heresthetics in Poland, 1989-93 Journal of Theoretical Politics, July 1, 2002; 14(3): 325 - 358. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Colomer Introduction: Disequilibrium Institutions and Pluralist Democracy Journal of Theoretical Politics, July 1, 2001; 13(3): 235 - 247. [PDF]

				G. Alexander Institutions, Path Dependence, and Democratic Consolidation Journal of Theoretical Politics, July 1, 2001; 13(3): 249 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Benoit and J. W. Schiemann Institutional Choice in New Democracies: Bargaining Over Hungary's 1989 Electoral Law Journal of Theoretical Politics, April 1, 2001; 13(2): 153 - 182. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Bogaards The Uneasy Relationship between Empirical and Normative Types in Consociational Theory Journal of Theoretical Politics, October 1, 2000; 12(4): 395 - 423. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. J. LUONG After the Break-up: Institutional Design in Transitional States Comparative Political Studies, June 1, 2000; 33(5): 563 - 592. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. FRYE A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies Comparative Political Studies, October 1, 1997; 30(5): 523 - 552. [Abstract]

				B. GEDDES A Comparative Perspective on the Leninist Legacy in Eastern Europe Comparative Political Studies, July 1, 1995; 28(2): 239 - 274. [Abstract]